At the Annual Meeting, coming up soon, there will be a motion to remove Chicago Aurora and Elgin car 321 from the Permanent Collection list. If you're a voting member, you should know the background to this issue. And even if you're not, you might be interested. It's not a simple matter, so we have a short version and a long version.
This post represents our opinion, of course, on why this is a good idea. But if anyone would like to submit a coherent argument why it's not a good idea, we will be happy to publish it.
SHORT VERSION
The 321 was originally acquired to be scrapped for parts, mostly the trucks and motors. The car's body has not been well maintained, has several severe structural problems, and is in poor condition, missing several important parts. There is no feasible plan for restoration, and the 321 has been replaced by car 319 from the same series, which has been fully restored and operates regularly. Furthermore, the 321 cannot be restored to operation without using the trucks and motors that were intended for another car, Milwaukee Electric 1129. The 321 takes up valuable barn track space, and if removed from the list it can provide parts for other projects as well as indoor storage for something else.
LONG VERSION
The second and third cars ever acquired (in 1955) by our Museum were two ex-Milwaukee Electric ("TM") interurban cars that had been sold to the London and Port Stanley in Canada. There they had been heavily modified. But they were the last two TM interurbans in existence. Due to the modifications in Canada, the Milwaukee fans, Tom Jervan in particular, were on the lookout for correct trucks and motors for car 1129, which had been converted to a trailer on the L&PS.
In 1962, cars and parts from the Chicago Aurora and Elgin became available at Wheaton. IRM chose two cars for preservation, the 309 and 431. Tom Jervan, Bob Bruneau, and others also arranged to buy the 321 for its trucks and motors, intending to scrap the body at Wheaton. The 321 was the only one of the Jewett series that nobody had selected for preservation, because the body was already in poor condition. Tom then arranged to trade the 321 for trucks and motors from one of the steel cars, that had been rebuilt but never used. But three days before the IRM equipment was scheduled to leave Wheaton, the junk dealer changed his mind and cancelled the deal on the trucks and motors.
With just days to go, there was no choice but to oil up the 321 and couple it onto the two cars slated for preservation. And so it wound up going to North Chicago. There it was quickly converted into storage space. The seats were removed, the walls were chopped out so shelves could be attached, roof parts removed and roof covered in tar paper, and so on. And just to make sure that nobody would ever be dumb enough to want to restore the 321, a lot of unnecessary damage was done and various parts removed and given away.
In 1964, the 321 was moved to Union along with the rest of the collection, and it continued to suffer from neglect and the weather over the next twelve years. It had been painted before the move, but that didn't last long, and much of the wooden body started to rot. The car probably would have been scrapped if room could have been found for all the parts inside.
By 1976, though, somebody dumb enough to want to restore the 321 had come along -- me. The 309 was an ongoing project, and I thought it would be good to have a two-car train if possible. And at that time it didn't look like any other CA&E wood cars would ever be available. I started lobbying to have the 321 preserved, and in 1978 I moved to have it put on the Permanent Collection list. The Museum was expanding rapidly in those days, and the 321 was one of several items that were added at the same meeting. All I can say is that it seemed like a good idea at the time.
Restoration work was done on the car over the next several years, as a background activity to restoration of the 309, mainly by myself, and later with Frank's help when he was old enough. This mostly stopped when we were able to acquire the 308, which was in much better overall condition.
And in 2009, when the Trolleyville collection became available, the 319 was a far better candidate for restoration than the 321. Bob Olson and I put up the money to include the 319 in the cars IRM was acquiring. (Best $10,000 we ever spent!) In order to put the 319 indoors, the 321 was tarped and put outside for the next seven years. In spite of the tarp, the body continued to deteriorate, and the roof has partly collapsed. The 321 has also served as a parts source for the 319 and other cars, so its present condition is pretty wretched. Feel free to see for yourself. It's on track 114, the car nearest the door.
And if you didn't like either the short version or the long version, we still have the
14 comments:
As a long-time CA&E enthusiast, I would be among the last to support removing the 321 from IRM permanently. While the return to operational condition is impossible, my long view is that keeping it for a static display, hands on display or otherwise would be preferrable to destroying it. Assuming that inside storage was "paid for" previously, keeping it for future display would not burden the treasury significantly. The car may be in poor condition, particularly when compared to other restored cars, it's only currently taking up space, and is still available for parts storage. If money for inside storage is necessary, then perhaps it should go. it's 100 years old, after all, and it represents about 10% of the entire CA&E wood fleet still on wheels. When it gets decommissioned from the IRM fleet it will be gone forever.
Thanks for your response. One point I would make is that removing the 321 from the permanent collection list is not equivalent to scrapping it. Our hope is that this change will allow us to find a new home for the car where it can be placed on static display. As long as the 321 is on the permanent collection list, we can't even entertain offers to "rehome" the car as a display piece elsewhere (and we've had one or two offers like this over the years). We don't have enough display barns to put the car on display, so it's just in storage, but somewhere else might be able to fix it up and put it in a publicly visible location. In fact, the motion to remove the car from the permanent collection list includes a section that the goal is to find a new home for the car and not to scrap or dismantle it.
Frank from what I’ve heard and read the car it would be better suited as a donor. The only unfortunate thing about this is. It’s the last remaining Jewett car.
Frank the above comment was from me. Bill Hirsch.
It is certainly not the last remaining CA&E Jewett car. We have the 319, which is in excellent condition and operates regularly, and there are three more from this series at other nearby museums.
I really like (and hope for) the idea of the body of the 321 being sent elsewhere. As stated earlier, that while in questionable condition, the 321 was still once part of the CA&E fleet. As far as I am aware -- no new cars for the CA&E have been built of recent. So a loss of another artifact from a finite source is still a loss in terms of preservation in my book. Whatever happens in the future, I'm glad that those in the past still kept it around up until now. (isn't that the point of a musuem?) And
hopefully, the 321 may be in the hands of others, for many more years to come.
Ashtin W
What's the real possibility of restoring 1129 with the trucks from 321? Unless 1129 can be restored - are you robbing Peter to pay Paul? Can 321 be cosmetically restored and placed on shop trucks? Not every car at IRM has to run.
Recently the Seashore museum donated the Berkshire street railway car to the Shelborne Falls museum as it was determined that the car stood a better chance of being preserved there.
There is a difference between preservation and hoarding one being a mental illness.
As I see it the parts needs for the 1129 were solved by the 318 scrapping. Find another home for 321.
Randy Stahl
Exactly. If we can find another home for the 321 we will. But first it needs to be removed from the Permanent Collection list.
What is next in line for barn space if 321 is removed?
That's a dangerous question. Riots and civil wars have started over less. But seriously, that will have to be decided, probably by the Board, when and if the time comes. I don't want to offer an opinion.
If it comes to that, contact multiple museums if interested. Such as the Chicago History Museum, or National Railway Museum (Green Bay). Somewhere where a permanent indoor display can be assured to avoid further deterioration.
It's generally left up to the Dept Curator.
One Idea that just came to mind: about the visitors center under construction, maybe the 321 can be placed on that panel track, and be made into a cutaway car to show visitors how a trolley/tram/interurban generates power. A similar exhibit is at the trolley museum right by Steamtown in Scranton, that has a cutaway floor and LED lights to show how a trolley works.
Post a Comment