Frank writes...
I barely took any photos on Sunday but of course Chuck was out and was taking good photos so I'm off the hook! I was conductor on the 308 and 319 with Jeff Obarek as the motorman. The crowd was light, even lighter than on Saturday, with the similar heat (highs in the mid-90s with the heat index up around 105 I think) and predictions of heavy thunderstorms in the afternoon keeping people away. Oh well. There were still visitors and they certainly enjoyed the parade of equipment that was out. There were six trains running: the CA&E cars, CRT cars, steam coach train, and caboose train pulled by ComEd 4 on the main line; CSL 144 on the streetcar line; and IT 101 doing shuttle trips.
More of the same. The CRT wood cars, with Bob Opal and Andy Sunderland as the crew, were brought out in the morning as a three-car train with the 24, 1268, and 1797. But almost immediately the 24 developed a fault and had to be set out on track 41 east. It turns out that insulation between two of the control wires in one of the conduits failed, leading to a reverser failure that meant the car would only go in one direction. Once it's fixed the car will be back in service.
When we returned around 2pm from our third main line trip, it was reported that a line of thunderstorms was approaching from the southwest and due in around 3:30. Rather than risk another main line trip at 2:15 we swapped places with the 101; they did a main line trip and we did a short-turn shuttle trip to Jefferson Street at 2:25. Then the train went straight to Barn 8 thanks to some deft dispatching by David Streeter. And it's a good thing too - an advance line of showers had popped up and passed through about three minutes after the cars made it indoors. An hour later, as predicted, heavy rains came through and drenched everything that was still out on the railroad.
By that time Joel was hard at work on a repeat of Saturday night's cookout in the car shop. While we were hanging around after dinner, Scott and I started looking over the C-21 controller that was donated on Saturday, soon joined by Richard. It's definitely more complete than our other examples and, most notably, still includes the large torsion spring on the handle shaft. See here:
I'm pretty curious exactly what the thinking behind all of this was, particularly the function of those dogs shown in the second video. My best guess is that perhaps there were two different ways to automate the car's acceleration: either by limit relay (this would be shown in the first video) or by simple timing, with the flywheel controlling the rate at which the contact drum advanced (as in the second video). The CA&E controlled acceleration using a limit relay under the car but Richard had mentioned that simple timing was another way of doing it. Any thoughts?
2 comments:
That's quite interesting. I didn't get a chance to examine it in detail when it arrived on Saturday. On the other C-21 controllers in our possession, the torsion spring was replaced with double star wheels, as you can see in an earlier post:
hickscarworks.blogspot.com/2014/05/inspection-prep.html
It doesn't look to me like the "new" controller has any star wheel at all; if the torsion spring is engaged, the ratchet mechanism on the controller top must provide that function. This will be fun to play with, but I'd have to say I would not want to try automatic acceleration on the actual car. Too many things could go wrong.
Frank- Here's how I would surmise that things are supposed to go. In automatic mode, the spring drum lock would be up (unlocked) so that the handle can be moved up to whatever ultimate point the operator wants and the spring takes up the difference. The ratchet dog is supposed to have a spring on it; there's a little boss that it fits over. This holds it up to its ratchet wheel, and drives the segment shaft up by means of the spring torque. The magnetic brake in the drum above it can stop the progression when the limit relay under the car tells it to, and then release and spin another notch or two before being energized again and stopping the progression. The brake is geared up quite a bit and slows the rotation down. The operator's handle would be pushed opposite to the wind-up direction (i.e. toward off) by the spring torque, in an amount corresponding to how many points haven't been taken by the segment shaft yet. This is stopped by the ratchet tooth on the underside of the handle, and the tooth is lifted when you push the handle backwards. This way there can be a backward torque on the handle shaft, but it doesn't move the handle until you want to shut off. When you do shut off, the lower ratchet wheel slips under the dog and drives the contacts back immediately without involving the brake drum or its gearing. There probably wouldn't be much need for a strong starwheel effect because you wouldn't really care much about individual points with automatic acceleration.
R. W. Schauer
Post a Comment