When traction historians think of "Van Dorn couplers" they think of the automatic link-and-pin coupler that was invented by William Van Dorn in the 1880s and used by dozens of different traction lines, including street railways, interurbans, and rapid transit systems. However the Van Dorn Coupler Company didn't only make link-and-pin couplers. It also branched out into other types of couplers, including the type that by the mid-1890s had become the statutory standard for interchange railroads, the MCB style or "knuckle" coupler.
The photographs and documents below are part of a collection of Van Dorn company records donated to IRM by Larry Larson. There are a number of photos and illustrations depicting Van Dorn MCB couplers but unfortunately not all are labeled, so it's tough to gauge the extent of the company's product line in this category and many of the images are basically unidentified. Van Dorn also seemed to equate knuckle couplers to MCB couplers in its literature. I've generally done the same in this article, using the terms interchangeably, even though many knuckle couplers (especially the odd types offered by Van Dorn) were not actually MCB-compliant, i.e. suitable for railroad interchange. All images are the property of the Illinois Railway Museum and may not be reprinted or reproduced without written permission.
#862 MCB Coupler
The #862 coupler seems to be one of Van Dorn's MCB offerings that was full-sized and geared towards the electric railway industry. Here we see a #862 coupler with #707 draft gear, a #712 carrier, and a #706 anchor.
Here's another image, a normal photograph, showing a #862 coupler with #1240 draft gear. You'll note that this example has a solid knuckle rather than a slotted one, as the first image shows. My best guess is that slotted knuckles may have been more common on traction lines because it was more common to use tow-bars to haul equipment that lacked couplers.
This is just the above photo turned into an illustration; the description again mentions the #862 coupler and states that it's matched with "#1240 twin spring draft gear."
#1315 MCB Coupler
The same problem that we saw with the link-and-pin coupler illustrations crops up again here: there's no sense of scale and it's virtually impossible to identify size differences between couplers. In this case, we are fortunate to have a copy of a sales brochure (at the bottom of this article) that identifies this particular coupler. It's a #1315, a half-size MCB coupler designed for use with mining equipment and other "large scale" type miniature railroad equipment, shown with #1500 draft gear.
This is another #1315 coupler; I'm not certain whether it's got different draft gear or whether this example just has fewer components removed.
#1815 MCB Coupler
The #1815 coupler shown here was another half-size MCB designed (apparently) primarily for use with mining equipment.
And here's a #1815 coupler in its natural environment, fitted to a mine cart of some sort. You can't see it but this example is fitted with #1795 draft gear according to the photograph description.
#2155 MCB Coupler
In 1926 Canadian National ordered a very unusual two-car, three-truck articulated doodlebug that was numbered 15817. According to this photo, it was fitted with Van Dorn's #2155 MCB coupler, which I can only assume was a larger railroad-grade type. There are more photos of this unusual doodlebug here.
Unidentified Couplers
As previously mentioned, a number of the coupler photos in the Van Dorn collection don't have anything written on them to identify the coupler type. This is one example. It may be a part of the half-size product line aimed at mining and industry.
Now this looks like the kind of thing I'd expect to see on a mining cart. Of course there's no really good way to tell the scale of what we're looking at. This closely resembles, and may in fact be, the #2184 "pocket type" half-size MCB coupler shown in the pamphlet at the bottom of this article.
This is more like what you'd expect to see on a piece of traction equipment. It resembles pretty closely the couplers on the ISC dump trailers pictured further down in this article
This looks to be the same coupler as in the previous photo, just from a different angle.
This is obviously a different type, but again the kind of radial coupler you'd expect to see on a piece of traction equipment. This one looks pretty modern to my eye.
And another one. This might be the same coupler as in the previous photo but it's hard to say.
This Dayton & Western freight trailer was built by AC&F in 1923 and, presumably, was fitted with Van Dorn MCB couplers. This was precisely the kind of niche a company like Van Dorn could fill: couplers that would work with steam-road locomotives or steam-road cars, but were designed with radial draw bars to traverse street railway curves.
There are four photos in the Van Dorn records showing Indiana Service Corp dump trailers built by the Differential Steel Car Company. According to the CERA bulletin on the Fort Wayne & Wabash Valley, cars 1034 and 1035 (plus four others numbered 1036-1039) were built in 1923 for ISC.
Here's a close-up of two of the ISC dump trailers coupled together.
Here's a close-up of one of the couplers. This style may be the same as the unidentified radial-style coupler pictured higher up in this article.
Another close-up of the coupler. This time there's a streetcar (and one other car, possibly an interurban) in the background. It closely resembles a car from the obscure Findlay-Mortimer Railway, which likely ran past the Differential plant on the north side of Findlay, where the dump trailers were manufactured.
The below pamphlet advertising half-size Van Dorn MCB couplers was included among the other company photographs and materials. It's too bad more pamphlets like this didn't survive, as it stands to reason that they would have written up material like this for other market segments like electric railway freight cars.
3 comments:
The variety of couplers is interesting. I know IRM has several examples. I do know that certain Van Dorn couplers will not work with modern shelf type couplers but I'm not sure if the similar Tomlinson couplers would work. At some point would you compare the couplers on the L-4 to the couplers on the D-22 ? I do not think they are both Van Dorn.
Randy Stahl
We haven't taken the time to go around and check on who manufactured the various types of couplers on the electric cars in our collection. I believe Tomlinson as well as Van Dorn manufactured knuckle couplers of various types. The TM work equipment, such as the L-4 and D-22, had MCB-compatible couplers because they had to handle standard railroad freight cars.
The usual Van Dorn link couplers, and the Tomlinson type, cannot be coupled to anything else without special adapters, which are usually big, heavy, and a real pain to use. For shop moves, we generally just use tow bars whenever possible.
The North Shore steel cars have knuckle couplers which look like they ought to be MCB-compatible, but aren't. Every so often somebody at IRM has to learn this lesson the hard way: you can, with some effort, couple a North Shore car to an MCB coupler, but it will be almost impossible to uncouple them again. There are ways to get around this, but it's complicated.
Anyway, the various types of couplers are a fascinating subject we could talk about for hours. Anybody for Stearns & Ward?
Hi. Do you have anymore photos of the Dayton & Western freight trailer? I'm in an Interurban Freight Trailer phase and am building models of them. Thanks, Charles
Post a Comment